We are dedicated to providing advanced research and expert opinion formed on analysis and review to better inform the public and decision makers on legislation and reforms.
PIF will also work with all forms of government, wherever possible, to promote and support the advancement of the public interest.
At PIF we have one goal - the public and their rights to liberty and democracy - and one passion - advancing the interests of the public and the public's welfare
It has come to our attention that the proposed Manufactured Homes (Residential Parks) Amendment Bill of 2024 is unusually heavy handed in its dealing with the Residential Parks industry in Queensland with wide spanning implications beyond the Residential Park industry and significant proposed effects on Park Operators and Home Owners of Residential Parks.
The operational effects of the proposed amendment bill are highly questionable in terms of its effectiveness to address any of the major issues identified in previous surveys, as well as its implications on individual rights to freehold property, democratic value and the long-term sustainability of Residential Parks.
During a significant housing crisis in Queensland, the government has tabled a raft of reforms to the Manufactured Homes (Residential Parks) Act 2003 (Qld) that will put direct pressure on the general Queensland housing market by putting pressure on those currently owning or looking to own homes in over 50's lifestyle Residential Parks. By further creating direct competition between over 50's and younger home buyers these reforms may greatly exacerbate the housing crisis which is also experiencing significant homelessness.
The current reforms are of a significant nature and concerningly are proposed to be passed without wider community engagement.
The proposed reforms put further pressure on the QCAT processes and expands their jurisdiction. Various submissions to the QLD parliamentary committee handling the reforms have expressed concerns on the lack of proposed funding or assessment on QCAT's ability to handle further volume through these reforms. It is also highly likely that these reforms may further deepen distress and prolong conflicts caught in technical issues caught within the proposed forced buy back reforms and forced revaluations of property and other expanded QCAT jurisdiction under the legislation.
Much like the issues experienced previously in the retirement village industry, the government has proposed that the Park Operators be forced to enter into a buy back scheme for all Home Owners.
The Forced Buy Back scheme has serious implications for Home Owners and Park Operators including perhaps the unforeseen ability of Park Operators to claw back houses at discounted or lower than market rates from Home Owners.
The proposed reforms have a surprising rent freeze surreptitiously included as part of the 'rent increase' chapter of the amendment bill and for the proposed new Act to be assented. This permanent rent freeze may be likened to the permanent freeze for bodies corporate to raise levies to maintain common property and may drive Park Operators to explore creative ways to compensate for the decrease in income.
The rent freeze also poses a significant dilemma to the medium and long term sustainability of Residential Parks and further raises questions as to whether the government intends to takeover parks when they fail due to lack of funds to upkeep or if the government through these reforms intends to see Residential Parks as being transformed into a Charitable or Not For Profit or subsidized sector.
Have an idea or opportunity or an issue for us to look into? Feel free to drop a note.
67 Depot Street, Northgate Queensland 4014, Australia
Open today | 09:00 am – 05:00 pm |
Get 10% off your first purchase when you sign up for our newsletter!
Copyright © 2024 Public Interest Forum - All Rights Reserved.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.